From Xinhua News Agency, Aug. 24, 2020. Complete text:

Los Angeles – Video-sharing social networking company TikTok on Monday [Aug. 24] filed a lawsuit against US President Donald Trump’s administration over Trump’s Aug. 6 executive order banning any US transactions with TikTok’s Chinese parent company ByteDance, starting in 45 days.

In the 39-page indictment acquired by Xinhua, Trump, US Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross and the Department of Commerce (DOC) were listed as defendants.

Ultra vires.

According to the document, TikTok accused the US authorities of stripping the rights of the company without presenting any evidence to justify the extreme action, and issuing the order without any due process as guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment to the US Constitution while banning the company with no notice or opportunity to be heard.

Meanwhile, the document cited Trump’s remarks on this issue, such as those proclaiming in a campaign-style news conference that TikTok had “no rights” and that he would ban the popular software if the company did not pay money to the government to secure its approval for any sale, saying that those words are unconstitutional.

“By demanding that Plaintiffs make a payment to the US Treasury as a condition for the sale of TikTok, the President has taken Plaintiffs’ property without compensation in violation of the Fifth Amendment,” the document said.

Moreover, the indictment said, by preventing TikTok from operating in the US, the executive order violates the company’s First Amendment rights in its code, an expressive means of communication.

The Los Angeles-based tech firm argued that the executive order is a misuse of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), authorizing the prohibition of activities that have not been found to be “an unusual and extraordinary threat” in this case.

TikTok argued that former presidents used the power authorized by the IEEPA to protect the country from threats from abroad, including terrorism and the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, but the recent executive order seeks to use the IEEPA against a US company with hundreds of employees across the country and to destroy an online community sharing video content by millions of Americans.

According to the company, as of June, the total number of TikTok’s monthly active users in the country soared to 91,937,040, and based on quarterly usage, 100 million Americans use the application to express themselves and connect with each other.

The plaintiffs, TikTok Inc. and ByteDance Ltd., seek a declaratory judgment and order invalidating and enjoining the executive order and any implementing regulations issued by the DOC later.

“The President’s executive order is unconstitutional and ultra vires, and must be enjoined,” the document read.

Political motive.

The company said it strongly disagreed with the Trump administration’s position that TikTok is a threat to national security and had voiced these objections previously.

In the last two years, US officials have repeatedly spread their rumors, saying that since TikTok was owned by Beijing-based tech firm ByteDance, it could pass on data it collects from Americans’ streaming videos to the Chinese government.

TikTok has said it has not been asked to share data with the Chinese government.

“There is no connection between TikTok and the Chinese government. Nor does the Chinese government exert any control over TikTok through ByteDance,” the company said. “The key personnel responsible for TikTok, including its CEO, Global Chief Security Officer, and General Counsel, are all Americans based in the US.”

TikTok’s US content moderation is likewise led by a US-based team and operates independently from China, and the popular application stores US user data on servers located in the US and Singapore, the company reiterated.

The company complained that it had provided these proofs to the US authorities many times. However, all of the efforts were dismissed crudely by the latter, thus it had to file the lawsuit.

It also suggested that the Trump administration imposed the extreme tough restrictions on the company based on a political motive.

The executive order was issued “for political reasons rather than because of an ‘unusual and extraordinary threat’ to the US, TikTok noted.

TikTok called the order “a pretext for furthering the President’s broader campaign of anti-China rhetoric in the run-up to the US election.”

Trump’s suggestion of ByteDance paying a fee to the US government for facilitating a deal to sell TikTok to a US company also showed that the regulatory move is a politicized one, lawyers said in the lawsuit.

“There is absolutely no evidence that TikTok poses a threat to US national security. The claim is based on speculation that any mobile device with a Chinese app can be used to spy on Americans,” Gary Hufbauer, a former US Treasury official and nonresident senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, told Xinhua.

“Paranoia pure and simple,” Hufbauer said, adding that he sees Washington’s TikTok ban “as a political move to rescue Trump’s flagging prospects.”

Counterproductive move.

Other business insiders in the US have similar insights into the White House’s executive orders against the Chinese entertainment platform and big internet companies like TikTok and WeChat.

Using the same excuse – purported national security concerns, the US authorities also barred US firms from transactions over WeChat, a popular social media app owned by Shenzhen-based Tencent, starting Sept. 20.

“By trying to block access to TikTok and WeChat, with claims that China is surveilling its users in America, Donald Trump is seeking to violate America’s First Amendment right to free speech,” the head of a prominent Hollywood production company told Xinhua on Monday, who asked not to be named for fear of reprisal against him and his company by the Trump administration.

He said that attacking Chinese social media platforms that enjoy wide support in the US is entirely counterproductive to trade relations with China and is harmful to Americans.

“While there may be legitimate issues to discuss with China regarding the improvement of the US trade deficit, bullying Chinese companies like TikTok and WeChat is neither a productive nor diplomatic manner by which to achieve improvements in US-China relations and address trade concerns,” he added.

A group of WeChat users also sued the Trump administration over the executive order banning transactions with WeChat on Friday in San Francisco, a lawyer familiar with the issue told Xinhua via WeChat Monday.

The group, which is not affiliated with WeChat or its owner Tencent, seeks to block the president’s Aug. 6 order which the group said is unconstitutional because it violates users’ due process and free speech rights.

The Chinese Foreign Ministry has expressed support for companies including TikTok to take up legal weapons to defend their legitimate rights and interests.

The ministry’s spokesperson Zhao Lijian said some US politicians are working to crush such Chinese companies as TikTok, WeChat and Huawei because they are down with an anti-China syndrome and will strike at anything Chinese.

“This is a repudiation of the principle of market economy and fair competition that the US has always boasted about. This is trampling on international rules and disrupting exchanges and cooperation in science, technology and innovation riding the trend of globalization,” Zhao said.

The world will “only see more clearly the true face of these self-serving bandits-like politicians,” he added.