Featured Content

VIEWPOINT The Future of UkraineV. Bodelan WORLD ISSUES The West’s Conflict with Russia: General Issues and Prospects (FREE content)V. Levchik The Arctic: A New Front of “Deep Warfare”O. Yanovsky, A. Ilnitsky History of the Creation and Outcomes of the Work of the Ad Hoc Committee to Elaborate a Comprehensive  International Convention on Countering the Use […]

THE indirect power confrontation between Russia and the collective West has been ongoing for nearly three years. It cannot be ruled out that, in one form or another, it will continue indefinitely, which is unsurprising – the current anti-Russian aggression is yet another stage in a comprehensive pressure campaign against Moscow by Euro-Atlantic political elites.

National Identity and Political Choice: The Experience of Russia and China (FREE content)D. Medvedev VIEWPOINT A Look Back at 2024 in an Attempt to Peer Into the FutureYu. Sayamov WORLD ISSUES First Global Cybercrime Treaty: From Geopolitical Confrontation to Professional CompromiseP. Litvishko      International Information Security: Russia at the UN – Ahead of the 25th Anniversary […]

THROUGHOUT history, Western civilization has sought to impose its will on external actors. Rather than relying on direct military defeat – rarely feasible due to the perpetual lack of material and human resources among Europeans – the preferred strategy was far simpler: the destruction of existing power structures from within, using others as proxies.

INTERVIEWS “The EAEU Has Been in Existence for 10 Years and Certainly Proven Its Effectiveness”A. Pankin VIEWPOINT The Raven’s Eye: Some Aspects of Great Power Relations at the Present StageA. Kramarenko WORLD ISSUES European Security: Stances of Russian and Foreign ExpertsA. Serikova Deep Warfare (FREE content)A. Ilnitsky, O. Yanovsky Unsustainable Sustainability: Results of the Summit […]

THE NATO declaration formulated at its 75th anniversary session has effectively shut the door on any discussion about coming to terms with the collective West. NATO and the West, embodied by the “elite horizontal” of the deep state, have chosen the path of war.1 The option of a Cold War 2.0 has, for several years now, been considered by analysts in the US and the UK as an absolute priority and the most beneficial path for them.

INTERVIEWS “The Americans Act Like a Street Gang That Picks on Passersby Just Because They Don’t Like the Color of Their Shoes”S. Ryabkov “If Ukraine Ever Conies Back to Its Senses, It Will Realize That It Simply Cannot Survive Without Russia and Good Neighborly Relations With Russia”K. Kosachev The Political Map of BRICSYu. Shafranik WORLD […]

MARIA Zakharova, Director of the Information and Press Department of the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, in her article “The Global West and Global South: Development Paths,” outlined several positions that are fundamentally important for the theory and practice of international relations.

VIEWPOINT From a Course on Political Demonology, or Fascism in a NutshellI. Kravchenko WORLD ISSUES The Great Game, or the Struggle for a New WorldP. Frolov Nuclear Doctrine Is a “Living Document”A. Oganesyan Functions of Nuclear Deterrence (CLICK to read)S. Karaganov UN Security Council Resolution 1540 on Non-Proliferation: 20 Years LaterG. Mashkov How to Jump-Start […]

BY PUBLISHING the article “The Use of Nuclear Weapons Could Protect Humanity from a Global Catastrophe”1 just under a year ago, I, along with some colleagues, helped initiate a global discussion2 on the role of nuclear weapons in preventing global war. Gradually, the concept of “strategic parasitism” – the belief held by most elites and societies, especially in the West, that peace is eternal and does not require effort to maintain, and that nonnuclear wars can be waged with impunity – began to recede into the past.